da ne zaboravim....jebi filijalu

Koliko sam shvatio neće moći da se vrate u ovom kolu.

Pete Carroll: 'We all gotta move on' from controversy
If you were hoping Pete Carroll would somehow dismiss Monday night's victory, or admit his Seattle Seahawks didn't earn what came their way against the Green Bay Packers, think again.
In an NFL Network interview that aired Tuesday on "NFL Total Access," Carroll offered no apologies on how the game's final seconds played out in Seattle.
Asked by Lindsay Rhodes if Seahawks wide receiver Golden Tate really caught that ball, Carroll provided a response that could melt Cheesehead Nation.
"Yeah, and I think it's cool that the league thought that, too," he said. "It's very questionable, it's a very questionable call to make. But it's simultaneous when they hit the ground. Up in the air, it looked like the DB had the advantage, but when they got to the ground, it's a matched-up catch, and it's a very hard one to call.
"We were fortunate the call went our way. But you've got to say the league reviewed it and said they agreed with what was called on the field, they just missed the pass interference."
Carroll doesn't believe it's fair to write off the game's final play as controversial only because replacement officials were involved.
"I think that's real easy to go that way, but I think it would have been a difficult call no matter who is looking at it," he said. "We heard one of the officials in the booth look at it right after the game, and he agreed that the issue they had was they didn't handle it right in terms of talking and sharing it with the referee, but that it was a difficult call, and you have to rule if it's simultaneous and all that."
"If I was on the other side, I would be saying the same kind of stuff," Carroll added. "I would totally understand, although we all gotta move on, and that's what we're doing here."

 

Uglavnom se slažem sa tim što govori Carroll. Tačno je da on nema šta da se izvinjava, nije doneo odluku, nije vršio nikakav pritisak i slično. Teško mi je da se složim sa njegovim mišljenjem da je bilo simultano hvatanje ali šta da se radi.

Nije istina ono što kaže da se NFL slaže da je dobra odluka, u saopštenju se nisu izjasnili povodom toga nego su samo "objasnili" situaciju.

“Seattle quarterback Russell Wilson threw a pass into the end zone.  Several players, including Seattle wide receiver Golden Tate and Green Bay safety M.D. Jennings, jumped into the air in an attempt to catch the ball.

“While the ball is in the air, Tate can be seen shoving Green Bay cornerback Sam Shields to the ground.  This should have been a penalty for offensive pass interference, which would have ended the game.  It was not called and is not reviewable in instant replay.

“When the players hit the ground in the end zone, the officials determined that both Tate and Jennings had possession of the ball.  Under the rule for simultaneous catch, the ball belongs to Tate, the offensive player.  The result of the play was a touchdown.

“Replay Official Howard Slavin stopped the game for an instant replay review.  The aspects of the play that were reviewable included if the ball hit the ground and who had possession of the ball.  In the end zone, a ruling of a simultaneous catch is reviewable.  That is not the case in the field of play, only in the end zone.

“Referee Wayne Elliott determined that no indisputable visual evidence existed to overturn the call on the field, and as a result, the on-field ruling of touchdown stood.  The NFL Officiating Department reviewed the video today and supports the decision not to overturn the on-field ruling following the instant replay review.

“The result of the game is final.”

Da se NFL slaže sa odlukom to bi decidirano rekli, išli su linijom manjeg otpora da ne bi povećavali poviku na nove sudije.

Još jedna stvar oko koje se apsolutno slažem sa Carrollom je da ne treba reći da su nove sudije isključivi krivci. Mislim da je Herm Edwards rekao na ESPN da bi standardne sudije u 10 takvih situacija 10 puta donele pravilnu odluku. Ko tu koga zajebava? Da li je neko gledao neki meč prethodnih godina gde nije bilo povika na sudije? Sudije su ljudi, uvek su grešili i uvek će grešiti. Verujem da su nove HDTV tehnologije doprinele da se detalji sada vide mnogo jasnije pa ono što se ranije nije moglo primetiti kao greška sada izgleda jasno kao dan. Rešenje? Vratite nam TV tehnologiju iz sedamdesetih.

Mislim da najveći problem nije nedovoljno poznavanje pravila nego nedostatak poštovanja prema sudijama. Svi očekuju da će ovi da pogreše, znaju da su tu privremeno pa mogu lako da vrše pritisak. Logično je da će u takvim situacijama doći do više grešaka nego obično.

Pogni se!

Samo troluj, moraš da nadoknadiš desetak dana provedenih u Københavnu...

Vidi ga Polux što se, ni kriv ni dužan, osetio prozvanim.

Sijetl ima opasnu ekipu, nisam iznenađen. Eno u Nostradamus temi sam prvi prognozirao da ulaze u PO.

Na stranu poraz i sudije, moram reći da sam oduševljen odbranom. Nakon očajnog prvog poluvremena sa Ninersima Capers je napravio nekoliko izmena i grupa se potpuno preporodila. Shields je mnogo bolji nego 2010. kada je bio pravo otkrovenje i biće zanimljivo kada se oporavi Devon House koji je pre povrede bio prvi kandidat za startera nasuprot Tramonu.

Napad je bleda senka prošlogodišnje grupe koja je bila nezaustavljiva. Istina je da smo igrali protiv nekih od najboljih odbrana u ligi ali pretpostavljam da je glavni problem što su timovi "uzeli pelcer" koji su primenili Chiefsi a McCarthy još nije uspeo da se prilagodi. Dolaze nam Saintsi čija odbrana je do sada bila lek i za mnogo lošije napade pa se nadam da će Aaron "produvati dizne" i da će sve posle biti lakše.

Sudije jesu pogrešile ali ima jedna stvar koja mi ovde više smeta...

4th down
5 igrača Packersa u blizini i svi idu na jebeni INT umesto da samo izbiju loptu. I treba nam ovakav poraz kad pravimo takve gluposti.

Ne mogu da verujem da su nam ukrali DVA INT-a

Rodgers u pojedinim trenucima baca kao da je na drogama. 

Uvek baca kao da je na drogama. Samo što su nekad dobre a nekad loše droge.

Na koju foru Jenningsu nisu dali prvi down.

Odbrana nas je odlično držala do ovog TD-a... Jbg, savršeno su odigrali.

Valjda će napad konačno nešto da uradi, ali njihova odbrana je odlična.

Obzirom na stil igre Hawksa verovatno će imati statistiku sličniju tekmi sa Ninersima nego sa Bearsima. Verovatno će imati mnogo manje šanse za neki big play nego protiv Cutlera.

Moze li do 10 poena?

Mož' da bidne ali mož' i da ne bidne.

Pošto je suđenje iz kola u kolo sve gore pretpostavljam da to ima veze sa pripremama timova. Verovatno prate šta sudije najslabije primećuju pa uče igrače da to maksimalno koriste.

Mrvti Broncosi!
Dabogda crkli u najgorim mukama, onda vaskrsli pa crkli ponovo u jos gorim mukama! 

Meni se čini da si ti promašio mnogo više od Broncosa...

Posle ovog kola vise necu biti poslednji, Betula preuzima 

 

Raidersi ludaci preokrenuli 

Još jedno odlično kolo za nama, u najavi je fenomenalna sezona.